The title, Problem Introduction Protocol sounds a bit pretentious. “The way we introduce problems to provide access to everyone” was a mouthful, so we went with PIP.
The Problem Introduction Protocol was a joint effort among all the coaches at the first All Learners convening. We were searching for a way to provide access to problems being used during Main Lesson. Often, students who had trouble would raise their hands almost immediately to declare, “I don’t get it.” We observed that there was something fundamentally amiss when a student couldn’t even begin a problem. As a result, we created an approach for introducing problems that, we thought, would provide an opportunity for everyone to take a stab at the problem. The original version was launched more than a year ago. After gathering some (admittedly thin) data from practitioners, we’ve come up with the version below.
The Ongoing Cohort of ALN is going to be testing this protocol this fall. We’ll report on the results in December. In the meantime, if any educators use what we describe in the blog below, please let us know what your experience was. You can start a conversation or add to an existing one here: https://alllearnersnetwork.com/community/
Problem Introduction Protocol
• Read the problem chorally.
• Ask, “What are we trying to figure out?”
• Ask, “What would an answer to that look like?”
• Brainstorm strategies
Read the problem chorally
We do this to accommodate students who might have difficulty with reading and those whose first language is not English. Older kids fuss a bit about reading chorally, but I make them do it anyway. It’s important that students get a chance to hear a clear reading of the problem.
In the first few iterations of this approach we had the teacher read the problem to students before the choral reading. I wouldn’t discourage this, particularly in one-on-one settings. In general, though, people reported that this was overkill.
Ask, “What are we trying to figure out?”
Step 2 involves determining what kind of answer we’re looking for. Many teachers write a statement on the board to summarize student thinking. Some teachers have students write a statement on the paper where they’re going to solve. Some (teachers of younger children) will write it on the board and ask students to copy it onto their papers.
Whether you write it or not, students should all be able to articulate what the goal of the problem or task is.
Ask, “What would an answer to that look like?”
This step was a contribution from our Maryland colleagues. It’s really helpful. We don’t use this step exactly as written. In other words, we don’t ask students this question. Instead, we ask about two elements of the problem:
What units will the answer have?
What’s a ballpark estimate for the answer?
The estimate is usually the result of a teacher question about extreme (and unreasonable) answers. Teachers will ask questions like, “Could it be 1? Could it be 100?” By eliminating unreasonable answers we’re helping kids narrow their thinking a bit.
So when you’re done with this step, kids should know what the units for the answer will be and what a reasonable solution might look like.
When I introduce this to teachers I have the habit of saying, “This piece should come with a Surgeon General’s Warning: Do Not Narrow the List of Strategies”. As students suggest strategies (addition, making a list, drawing a picture, multiplication, etc.) teachers simply respond by saying, “We might be able to use that strategy.”
An example of what doesn’t work is when teachers say that one strategy is the “right” one: “Yes, this is a division problem.” We want to leave the possibility open for children to use whatever makes the most sense to them, even if (right now) it’s not the most efficient approach.
One added piece to the brainstorming that seems to work well is to record the strategies on the board. As students are getting started they can refer to these.
What about highlighting important information?
This is a step that we originally included, and one that is recommended by several texts on supporting struggling learners. While we want children to get the important information from the problem, the practice of highlighting or underlining numbers or important facts often translates into students pulling numbers out of the problem and doing some (often inappropriate) arithmetic. The result is a “How Old is the Shepherd?” outcome. For this reason we don’t use this step in the protocol. It doesn’t mean, of course, that you can’t. But if you have students find important information, be sure they have a strategy that makes sense to them and makes sense mathematically.
The Problem Introduction Protocol, then, facilitates reading of the problem, focuses on what the answer is trying to find, gives a decent estimate for a solution, and provides a variety of strategies for getting started. So far it has provided greater access for students to get started with problem solving. As always, we’re interested in your experience with this technique. Please let us know how it worked for you.